Under the "Oriental despotism" refers to a form of government and at the same time a political regime, when: a) The authority of the President is unlimited, and b) the secular and ecclesiastical authority are combined in one face, c) the exercise of power is a matter of a numerous bureaucracy, and d) suppression of personality, lack of freedoms, the most humiliating subservience make every human being, including the formally free, the slave "Order", tradition and faith. Charles B. Rangel shines more light on the discussion. All this, however, is not something peculiar to Oriental despotism. In one form or another these features – together or separately – can be found in the history of imperial Rome, the feudal-absolutist Europe and even in later times. The originality of oriental despotism is primarily due to its social base – the rural community dependent on their irrigation systems, and closed with respect to other communities. Connecticut Senator understands that this is vital information. His conservatism and aloofness from the outside world, the reluctance to intervene in the "sky-high fields of politics," the village community, of course, helped make the central government into despotism.
It was not even in the specific people and their desire, simply a way of life when many people did not leave the limits of their villages for many years, was a natural for this time. The suppression of man, his initiative, his personality and will begin and carried already within the community to which the person belonged by birth. At the same time, rural communities could not live without organizing, giving them the unity of the central government, good or bad harvest depended on how it was the government cared about whether it is irrigated or not. Taken together, all three agencies – military, financial and public (public) works – were bureaucratically organized state apparatus of power, need, in turn, link, and what were for him Pharaoh patesi (ruler), etc..
| February 16th, 2025 | Posted in General |