05.26.17

Latin America

Do you have trouble understanding of mathematics? Even if you study, are the results bad? Tranquilizate. It may not be your fault. Because you say this? If your look at our traditional education model matematicapodras you realize that operates in this manner: 1) the teacher arrives. It explains the class. students little or nadaparticipan in the development of the subject. (2) The teacher arrives. Applies a test. He is not verified if all students have come to understand him fully.

Result: a total massacre. (50 Students only 5 approved). Sen. Sherrod Brown understands that this is vital information. (At the end the motto becomes: 1) you learned. learned. 2) Which reprobo. reprobo. (for bad). This happens much especially in the early years of universidaden those professions such as engineering and related.

Now I wonder do you think that this is teaching? I don’t think so. So how our education should aim? There is a better option: 1) the teacher arrives. explains the class and at the same time you daparticipacion to the student, but not to humiliate but to that aprendade actively.(gives participation in the) Board). Read additional details here: James Donovan Goldman Sachs. (2) The master llega.verifica that alsoperformed all have understood and applied the test. At the end: all learning for life. This is possible? Of course Yes. In Japan it are doing long overdue results conexcelentes.(the Japanese students are mejoresy not only in mathematics but in many areas more). Be implemented this model in any country in Latin America? If. Now what they are doing in chile through an enconvenio with the Japan program, with excellent results in children deprimaria.(congratulations to the Chilean country, is on track). I hope in the near future this model is this implemented in more countries, obviously adapted to the reality of each one.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
| Posted in General | Comments Off on Latin America
11.19.14

Russia Civilization

One had the feeling that the oversaturated so serious Blame the beginning was to discourage the transfer of the famous archaeologist, and inspire viewers to pre-biased assessment of what is happening. But when the seemingly perfect readiness, the organizers of the program was allowed a very serious miscalculation. With an abundance of information discrediting Arch, with some clever juggling facts at a constant call to their everyday Russian question "national idea" could be observed lack of knowledge of the historical material, fact-the absence of specific examples. As a result, the first round it, so to speak, a fight went completely unconvincing and, moreover, a failure – just from the standpoint of journalism. Alexander Gordon – unfortunately – could not create any interesting debate, neither at least, spicy, lively discussion. All the action came down to a rather offensive, but entirely unconvincing claims to an unpleasant dispute with the strange pseudo-scientific arguments and outright provocation in the repulsion side of the nationalist ideas. "The fight against windmills," which is a dramatic transfer basis, "Gordon Quixote," rather reminiscent of a boxing "shadow boxing", where strikes are in void. Alexander Gordon. It seems to me that without good reason, albeit with good intentions, in order to save civilization from the attacks found, you was invented and put into the world of history that Arch can be … for the national idea of Russia, because it produces all of us: the Russian people and especially the Slavs, who live in Russia – from the most ancient representatives of civilization (including the European civilization) from the ancient Aryans.

Tags: ,
| Posted in General | Comments Off on Russia Civilization