North Korea
The emerging acknowledged, like the G8, the need to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius. Although US President Barack Obama hailed a historic consensus, for the Secretary-General of the UN, Ban Ki-moon, the results are insufficient. A related site: Amazon mentions similar findings. The G8 spoke signals stabilization of the world economy, but warned that there are still having considerable risks and that the rise in unemployment could put in trouble the social stability. At the Summit there were divergences on the way out of the crisis scenarios. Some countries, such as United States, requested that does not put an end hastily to stimulus plans, while Russia and Germany urged to look beyond the crisis. The leaders of the G8 and major emerging countries rejected all protectionism and pledged to close the Doha round of global trade liberalization in 2010.
Countries will meet at the level of Trade Ministers before the next G20 Summit, which will take place in September in Pittsburgh (United States). The G8 and other countries participating at the Summit pledged to unlock $ 20 billion over three years to fight hunger in the world, investing to develop agriculture in the countries of the South. Major contributors include United States, Japan, the European Union, France and the Netherlands. The G8 said determined to find a diplomatic solution with regard to the nuclear ambitions of Iran, and gave term the Islamic Republic until the end of September to respond to the offer of dialogue. The G8 is also said deeply concerned by the violence unleashed after the re-election of the ultra-conservative Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad, who according to his detractors was fraudulent.
The G8 strongly condemned the nuclear test and the firing of missiles carried out in recent months by North Korea well threaten the peace and stability in the region and beyond. Some say that the achievements announced so far seem sufficient as before Barack Obama considered past this first review serious conditions of leadership in major international forums. This opportunity was, moreover, particularly difficult, since it came at a time of great uncertainty about the future of the G-8 and enormous skepticism about the chances of success. However, host of quotation, Silvio Berlusconi, not hiding his disappointment at the end of the meeting. And made the following reflection after exposing the outcomes of the Summit. I think that the G14 is the future – said Berlusconi-. Because it is a more suitable platform for making important decisions that the G8, at least with regard to the world economy. All ended with a solemn ceremony to honor the victims who died last month of April in the terrible earthquake that lived in the region of lAquila. Three hundred people died in the earthquake and tens of thousands were left homeless. Many of them are still today living in tents.
01.8.14The Royal Decree
-That this reason refers to your specific personal situation. -That the alleged reason justifies the right of opposition requested. In the request that the individual performs is omitted this reason, furthermore does not reference to what specific data refers to the exercise of rights holder, says the Agency, and is therefore dismissed the application for protection of rights. It takes longer, that is called to throw the ball into the roof of another. As regards the reference to specific data, I think the same left perfectly accredited, if in all the application not referenced other data, nothing more than the identification, name and surname, is presumably that the data relate to these.
But there may still be doubts about those, the same Royal Decree cited in its article 25.3 indicates that in the event that the application does not meet the requirements specified in the first section, responsible for the file should request the rectification thereof. And it seems to be that responsible did not make any mention in this sense, then he understood that the request was well made and did not need any additional data. As regards the accreditation of a plea, if the actual Decree says something will be. But it seems obvious that this reason, implicitly refers to not want that your data will appear in the search engines, in addition we can also deduce, by the nature of the right, that is a right against the dignity, self-image, and specific data protection, that motivated the enactment of a law specifically as the LOPD. But what is more, within these 25 sheets which previously referred, the Agency makes express reference to a resolution of the same, the relapse in the procedure of protection of rights TD/266/2.007 that indicates it should be proclaiming that any citizen who enjoys the status of public figure nor is indeed noticiable object of public relevance must resign to support their personal data moving across the network without being able to react or correct the illegitimate inclusion thereof in a system of universal communication such as the Internet. In this respect it seems deducted if the person is in fact noticiable object having to endure lifelong inclusion of this news on the Internet, when the resolution itself indicates that if your personal data are not in the public interest, for not contributing your knowledge to forge a free public opinion as basilar pillar of the democratic State, it must enjoy reactive mechanisms covered in law (such as the right of cancellation of personal data). This would add, who made missing data in this resolution, and that does not put the date of the news.
If the news was published a long time ago, the character of news lost over time, and therefore no maintenance is required of it in time. The Agency has also stated in various resolutions on the right to oblivion. And finally, I would like to point that the applicant made two alternative requests, cancellation and opposition alternately. The Royal Decree does not require accreditation of any reason for the exercise of this right, and therefore the Agency, it should have been resolved on this alternative request.
12.5.13Department Status
The new blackmail of the Department of State JOSE BRECHNER the Chief of the Cabinet of Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel, said that the efforts that will make North America to stop the Iranian nuclear threat will depend on the progress that Israel achieves in its talks with the Palestinian Authority. According to the Member of the Knesset, Yakov Katz, head of the National Union Party, what Emanuel calls is that Israel commits suicide, in exchange for United States stop a global threat. They expect Israel to accept the two-State solution, which will cause that Hamas not only US threatens missile from Gaza, but also from Judea and Samaria. And this is nothing less than the idea of a Jew, Rahm Emanuel, whose father fought in the Irgun against the British Empire, and who is identified with the left ultra that seeks the destruction of Israel. Is not the first time that State Department Israel blackmailing, he did so during the administration of George Bush father in 1991, urging him to not defend against missiles launched by Saddam Hussein from Iraq to change the support of the Arab world United States. Once Israel tolerated to be bombed, the same Government refused for a long time to secure a loan by 10 billion dollars, which was going to allow building homes for nearly a million Russian immigrants, inhumanly conditioning that please to not construct new settlements in the West Bank, while there were more than 200,000 people without shelter.
In 1948, when the Jewish State had to fend off numerous and well armed Arab armies, did with molotov cocktails and homemade weapons because his best friend did not give military support. Something similar happened in the wars of 1956 and 1967 when he had to resort to triangulations and arms dealers, because the U.S. Government refused to sell military equipment he needed to not be razed.
| Posted in General | Comments Off on North Korea