Atlantic Treaty Organization
After the end of World War II as they were the major capitalist powers of Europe, which have sought to contain Soviet expansion and founded in April 1949 for Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) along with the U.S., Canada and other eight countries Western Europe. Although both Germany and defeated his troops settled in the western occupation of the defeated nation, its military victory came at the expense of losing its former space on the world stage and having to dispose of their units after having been the largest empires Grocery remaining. They coordinated in various processes and prompted Israel to invade Egypt in 1956 when President Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. Despite these similarities the a Entente Cordiale had strong contradictions. In 1966 Charles de Gaulle led France to withdraw from NATO's integrated command to have its own military structure and, although the republic has been bringing back to certain structures of this, there are still tensions. France has wanted to be part of the Atlantic Alliance while maintaining their independence and clashes with U.S., something that sets him apart from the total subordination that other countries have had in Washington. While Britain has sought to maintain a strategic alliance with the U.S., be a pillar of NATO and recently has been the main ally Washington to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, France is in NATO but in a limited way, has had strong friction with the U.S. and has spent his strategy for making Europe a more equip itself with its own constitution, currency and military. The very socio-economic structure of both powers is different.
Military Blocs
When people realize that the unification of military blocs – the path to war, but war is a disaster, military alliances fall apart. Of course, this premise is controversial. And yet, imagine that countries no one is threatening a military attack, and begin to reduce armies. They will be reduced to a value sufficient to fight in local skirmishes, antidiversionnyh operations in the fight against terrorism. This will reduce much armed forces, and together with them and the MIC.
What to do with closing jobs? And just the thought of Sevastopol. In section USSR Sevastopol became Ukrainian. Ukraine does not need an army and navy, in such amount as they were in the Soviet Union. Ukrainians shout "Get out!" Russian Black Sea Fleet. But the screaming somewhere in Lutsk, Lviv or. A Ukrainian Sevastopol does not cry – it works in Russian enterprises and Russian eats bread! Reduction of the armed forces will affect the basic security APU. In Sevastopol, the base value of support is much larger than necessary for the Ukrainian fleet size.
A Sevastopol lease is held by the base complex. But the rental fleet of the Russian Federation may end before the contractual term that Sebastopol would be tantamount to disaster. For the city budget will be lost 450 million hryvnia, then, as the manufacturing of Sevastopol in 2000 was 325.4 million hryvnia. In other words the city will not be able to pay not only with the state, but also with the workers, the deficit will amount to 125 million hryvnia.
12.14.13Islamic University
The head of internal security of Israel, Yuval Diskin told the cabinet on Wednesday that Hamas’s ability to govern has been “…
However, the pressure of public opinion in the Arab countries forcing their leaders to continue fighting Israel. As part of this struggle, Egypt continued to support war, and drive a military alliance with Syria in 1966. Both Syria and Egypt were backed by the Soviet Union.
On May 17, 1967, Egypt has formally requested the withdrawal of UN troops interposition (UNEF), and started remilitarizar the Sinai and the border with Israel. On May 23 the same year, Egypt blocked the Straits of Tiran, which according to Israel contradicted the maritime laws and the UN was due to war. On May 30, the popular pressure on Jordan to King Hussein achievement away from its traditional alliance with the Western powers and forced to join the Egyptian-Syrian alliance, giving the command of its forces to an Egyptian general. On June 4 Iraq joined the coalition.
Although the government of Israel does not want war and feared, the Israeli military believed that it was necessary to strike immediately because without the advantage of surprise, Israel could not survive. Israel had mobilized reservists and could not maintain that mobilization indefinitely. Faced with the choice of attacking or demobilize not received any assurance from the U.S. of an international initiative to boost and with the Egyptian government daily public showing of his desire not to cool the situation, the government of Israel and forget their reluctance followed the advice of his generals. Other doubt that the Arabs, despite all the intense bellicose rhetoric and the buildup of troops on the border, they were really ready to attack Israel. Ted Thornton says even that “Egyptian troop movements were a pretext, had long planned for Israeli troops won more territory.” This source quotes Yitzhak Rabin, who said a year after the war:
I do not think I would like Nasser war. The two divisions he sent to Sinai in May 1967 had not been sufficient to launch an offensive against Israel. the wise and what we knew.
Le Monde, February 1968.
But we know that Egypt will not send only two, but seven divisions 2 ª, 3rd rd, 4A meetings, Shazli Force, 6à meetings, and 20A ª ª 7A) with 100 thousand soldiers and 1,000 tanks, against the Israeli border. 5 Divisions were in the Sinai and Gaza 2. These figures are consistent with other sources, such as:
Egypt had bet seven divisions, 100,000 men and 1,000 tanks.
alvaro Abos, “Political developments of the century” – Volume 9 The Six-Day War, page 41.
So it is doubtful or at least taken out of context, the alleged quote from Rabin, as a general size of the deployment could not ignore Egyptian and minimize much less.
Also offered Israel peace in an official at the UN on October 8, 1968, proposing to return to the armistice lines of 1949 with a special status for Jerusalem (City Unified and Open), which flatly rejects a war of expansion. The Israeli proposal of 9 points, was rejected by the Arabs, as well as Resolutions 242 and 194 .-
But sources show that the deployment of seven Egyptian divisions:. could not leave any doubt Rabin, or their number (seven), or their disposal nor its purpose.
Menachem Begin, then the match Gahal also said years later:
In June 1967 we had an option again. The concentration of Egyptian troops in Sinai did not prove that Nasser was really attacking. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.
New York Times, August 21, 1982.
However, in view of the Israeli president Chaim Herzog (military analyst during the conflict), this was not the opinion of the Israeli military in 1967 nor are they the other Israeli military historians who have dealt extensively with the war, Michael B . Oren, who generally argue, from the detailed study of documents and interviews with his players, that Israel had no choice from the military point of view. So, Chaim Herzog said that the situation in which Israel was surrounded by a huge Arab armies that exceeded troops, planes and tanks, had no option to speculate on whether they were really ready to attack, because no “strategic depth” in which to deploy and, therefore, able to answer:
In 1967, when it became clear that the war was just around the corner, the Israeli leadership concluded that it should not be allowed to make the first move Arabs because, by its own weight, get a head start that Israel could not cope
Chaim Herzog, The War of Yom Kippur, unpublished, 2004, pp. israel First, these rocket attacks must stop. … Israel attacked the Islamic University in Gaza without causing deaths …
Israel will allow more than 440 foreigners living in the Gaza Strip … Israel continues shelling Gaza for the seventh consecutive day …
When Israel dismantle its settlements and withdrew from the Gaza Strip … Israel still controls the airspace of the Gaza Strip as well as the …
The West Bank and Gaza Strip by Elisha Efrat (Kindle Edition – April 16, 2007) – Kindle Book
Metropolitan District
Worrying about the present government to find solutions, actions, programs that prevent the growth of the informal economy in fact that Caracas is estimated only about 50,000 people who work in She and about two million nationwide. It is known as Aguilar said of the 5 million people in Venezuela work in informal trade activities, 30% is devoted to trade. Itinerant merchants or peddlers, they are a sub-group within the informal trade, and in relation to the informal economy as a whole, are just the visible tip of this huge iceberg. For our specific context, it is estimated that in the Metropolitan District of Caracas about 50,000 families are dedicated to hawkers. The peddler as an economic activity, are associated with serious problems that are an expression of social deterioration: poor quality and unproductive labor, crime, abandoned children, child labor and prostitution, etc. Follow other leaders, such as Raymond Dalio, and add to your knowledge base. These problems are shared so both informal traders and neighbors, passers-by pedestrians, workers in the area and formal traders.
But groups are not only affected by the growth of a peddler. Other branches of economic activity further upstream in this activity recognize a potential business important mean a decentralized and efficient army of vendors. Similarly criminals, mafias, and other groups, benefit from the apparent anarchy that prevails in areas where this activity proliferates. Finally, some public officials seem to recognize the peddler an important "breeding ground" for the development of populist clientelist practices or corruption. However, the social demand for finding solutions to such a dramatic problem, seems to encourage the achievement of a shared solution to reverse the negative trends and promotes the positive phenomenon.
12.9.13Venezuelan Management
The venenezolano scene presents/displays great turbulences, political instability that has affected significantly economy, social, political, the cultural one and mainly in their enterprise productive sector where many companies have closed and others are with a low production that the consumer has affected significantly, dice to that many products have had to acquire from other countries to a nonfavorable price and taking step to a dependency of very harmful import. The certain thing, that before this reality, to the excellent incidence of the policies, programs. strategies of the present government have entailed to that today more than ever the Venezuelan management that confronts this reality it must be reorganized, generate new approaches administrative and mainly to know how to confront and to face the challenges. Before this evidence it does not surprise that it is said that the Venezuelan scene presents/displays great turbulences in the economic thing, political, social, cultural, educational that a generating management of changes demands, able to face the turbulences a roll, determinant in everything what can to lead to leave windy these turbulences. The Venezuelan management must adapt to the new knowledge that demand the present scenes, cannot remain anchored in the past, applying old woman theories, tools, models that attempt against the survival of the organizations where they toil. Today the scenes are more dynamic, put under constantly changes, innovations, to turbulences, where the Alliances are determining figures in the opening to conquer new markets. I consider that many of the characteristics that I show next, correspond more weaknesses than strengths since far from to grant to the organization productivity and competitiveness, generates retrabados, inefficiency and inefficiency. Weaknesses Are many the weaknesses that at the moment the management confronts that can be transformed in: Very little knowledge of the modern administration.
12.9.13Ministry Agreement
The keys of the rough draft the rough draft of the first draft of law of reform of the collective negotiation sent by the Government to the social agents will allow the industralist to arrange with general character of 5% of the day of annual work to distribute it of irregular, safe way pact against with the representatives of the workers, This percentage is inferior to 15% that it had established like minimum Ceoe in his last proposal of the 2 of June, with that the negotiations between employer’s association and unions were settled. The Government solves therefore a part of the questions regarding the internal flexibility, that will be able to be agreed to in the collective agreements of company, without perjucio than he determines myself in the sectorial agreements. The Ministry of Work maintains in its proposal that before the lack in agreement to renew an expired agreement this one is prorogued (the call ultraactivity) and gives more protagonism to the agreement of company as well as to the joint commissions. According to the document of Work to which it has had access, " in dcto of pact, when the maximum term of negotiation without being reached an agreement had passed and the parts of the agreement would not have been put under the procedures to which talks about the previous paragraph (of mediation or arbitration) or these would not have solved the discrepancy, will stay the use of the agreement colectivo". These are the main keys of the rough draft sent by the Government to employer’s association and unions: The ultraactivity stays. The Government has decided to maintain the ultraactivity, something that wanted to limit Ceoe and the unions asked that followed to avoid that before the lack in agreement to renew an agreement this one would decay and would suppose a loss of rights for the workers.
12.7.13Civil Code
In other words, adhesion contract is the opposite of on the same level contract, that is, that one that has its written clauses argued for both the contractual parts. One notices here, that for being written by only one of the parts, the adhesion contract already is born unbalancing contractual the legal relationship, since that one that creates the contract makes, it, in rule, in order to reach only its yearnings. In this direction, when we take for object contracts of location of property carried through between real estate citizen and, attempting against to the fact many people interested in the location and few administrators of property to exist, can conclude that these represent an adhesion contract species. Destarte, can be said that to contracts of location of property the legal devices to adhesion contracts are applied pertinent, between them art. 424 of the Civil Code, that prays the following one: ' ' in adhesion contracts, the clauses are null that stipulate the anticipated resignation of the adherent resultant right a of the nature of negcio' '. It is understood for ' ' resultant right of the nature of negcio' ' , those rights that compose contract independently of the will of the parts. In ours to feel, the right to the indemnity for the improvements introduced for the renter, as well as the lien, is natural elements of the contract of location of property. 2.
A Legal relationship of Consumption. The consumption relation is not defined in law, becoming necessary to bring of the Right of the Consumer the concepts of ' ' consumidor' ' ' ' fornecedor' ' , so that if it characterizes a consumeirista relation. In this way, from the analysis of the perspectives of the contractual parts, only it is that if it can say to be this a consumption relation or not.
12.5.13Department Status
The new blackmail of the Department of State JOSE BRECHNER the Chief of the Cabinet of Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel, said that the efforts that will make North America to stop the Iranian nuclear threat will depend on the progress that Israel achieves in its talks with the Palestinian Authority. According to the Member of the Knesset, Yakov Katz, head of the National Union Party, what Emanuel calls is that Israel commits suicide, in exchange for United States stop a global threat. They expect Israel to accept the two-State solution, which will cause that Hamas not only US threatens missile from Gaza, but also from Judea and Samaria. And this is nothing less than the idea of a Jew, Rahm Emanuel, whose father fought in the Irgun against the British Empire, and who is identified with the left ultra that seeks the destruction of Israel. Is not the first time that State Department Israel blackmailing, he did so during the administration of George Bush father in 1991, urging him to not defend against missiles launched by Saddam Hussein from Iraq to change the support of the Arab world United States. Once Israel tolerated to be bombed, the same Government refused for a long time to secure a loan by 10 billion dollars, which was going to allow building homes for nearly a million Russian immigrants, inhumanly conditioning that please to not construct new settlements in the West Bank, while there were more than 200,000 people without shelter.
In 1948, when the Jewish State had to fend off numerous and well armed Arab armies, did with molotov cocktails and homemade weapons because his best friend did not give military support. Something similar happened in the wars of 1956 and 1967 when he had to resort to triangulations and arms dealers, because the U.S. Government refused to sell military equipment he needed to not be razed.