Spanish Government
As you know, Willy (Guillermo) Toledo is actor, and nonbad, indeed. In the interludios, instead of to play petanca or the Monopoly, like others, it is dedicated to the political activism. The last time this one has taken to the Sahara, with 16 compatriots more, to arm it to the Moroccan regime occupant of that one territory. Apparently, and according to its testimony, the police of Mohamed I SAW them has beaten the sheepskin although, luckily, without leaving them thrown in no gloomy mazmorra. What minus to them could happen knowing how to the sum sultn! The good thing of the case, is that the actor of deficiencies to whom throws the fault is to the Spanish Government, by not to have sent a pair of F-16 to look for to them. Milk! It is that while the State saves until in the pensions of the retired poor men and reduces the pay to the civil servants would have had to be spent pastn at the expense of the revolutionary tourism of Mr.
Toledo and his cuates. And that they go of sandstone, being conceited of igualitarismo and others grgaras. Clear that, customary to live on public subsidys, main source of income of the world of the nonsense of this country, to fly in a most expensive supersonic fighter must seem to them a triviality. There are lost the papers. Not only because there is to rescue with our taxes to reckless climbers of the Anapurna or lost tourists in the desert, but because the Government usually pays numerous ransoms to somales pirates or to those who they kidnap to imprudent cooperators who finish confraternizar with their detectors.
That is, that the State us solves everything to it, until the caused thing by our boldness, folly or negligence. The good thing of the case is that Mr. Toledo carried out one recently closed defense of the regime of Cuba, justifying that the Castro dictatorship let die in its hunger strike to the Orlando dissident Zapata, ” delincuente” , according to our actor. It would like me that Willy Toledo was coherent with itself and its presumed shared in common causes going to the Caribbean island to visit the political prisoners of that one regime and would mount a public show demanding the freedom of all the prisoners by crimes of opinion. After the consequent police reaction, certainly it would miss the attitude of the Moroccan authorities. In addition, it could not request the arrival of F-16 to take it from return to house because the Cuban jails thus one does not leave as well as. Clear that never would be happened to him to do it to our actor because, besides sectarian, who is it, and much, which does not seem is that he is stupid.
03.28.18Constitutional Procedural Code
On the other hand, in order to confer major predecibilidad to constitutional justice, the legislator of the Constitutional Procedural Code also has introduced the technique of the precedent, in its article VII of the preliminary title, when establishing that the sentences of the Constitutional Court that acquire the authority of judged thing constitute binding precedent when therefore expresses Sentencia, needing the end of its normative effect () . In this way, although as much the jurisprudence as the constitutional precedent has common the characteristic of their binding effect, in the sense that no authority, civil servant or individual it can resist to his obligatory fulfillment, the Court, through constitutional precedent, has general a normative power, extracting a norm from a tactical mission. Conditions of the use of the precedent: This it is come off that the precedent is a technique for the arrangement of the jurisprudence allowing at the same time as the Court exerts a true one to be able normative with the restrictions that its own jurisprudence will have to be delimiting gradually. Of preliminary way it can settle down, nevertheless, that one first restriction is referred to relation enters case and precedent. As it happens in the countries of the Common Law () the value of precedent of a decision is determined by what a judge decides indeed in the sentence. More what indeed it is decided, is certain in relation to the case (fattispecie) concrete of the controversy submissive in opinion. In this sense, this Associated one considers that this rule also is valid for our system, even though also is truth that the configuration of the case in our legal system not always is related to concrete facts but to the evaluation in abstract of norms, as it happens in the case of the control of consitutionality of the Law, for example. It, however, does not do that the normative precedent that this Associated externalice, does not have a direct relation with the central question that must be decided because thus it has been put under the Constitutional Court.
| Posted in General | Comments Off on Spanish Government